|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: Peter Splingaerd
Off. (415) 362-0209 Fax. (415) 362-0524
WHY MUST BIG BUSINESS PAY SO MUCH FOR AIRLINE TICKETS?
In no other industry does the big customer pay more
than the small customer. Aside from being able to afford $2,000 for tickets
that are worth only $330, the main reason big business cannot avoid paying
these higher fares lies in the way their tickets are bought. They isolate
their travelers from the rest of the world that pays one third as much, by
forcing them to buy their tickets exclusively through one big corporate travel
agency. Actually, these are not travel agents at all. They are only booking
agencies.
Travel agencies - the real ones - used by individuals spending
their own money, will use everything they know, to help passengers pay the
lowest possible fare. When a traveler needs to go to New York from San Francisco,
the corporate agent will have you pay $2,000 less whatever token discount
the travel department negotiated off this full fare. The same employee, if
allowed to go to his own travel agent -a real travel agent -will pay between
$330 and $800 for the same trip and perhaps the very same flights. Nobody
in his right mind would go to his corporate agent for an airline ticket if
he had to pay for it himself. By yearend, the cost of using one exclusive
large agency is around 50% of the total airline ticket expense. This is exactly
what airlines want large accounts to do. It separates other people's money
travelers from own money travelers.
If big business allowed their travelers to mingle with the
rest of the world paying one third as much, the airlines would not have such
a high range of prices any more because nobody would buy the higher fares.
A large corporation will pay around 50% less for airline tickets if it allowed
employees to buy tickets from their personal travel agents. Remember that
every rule the airlines create has only one purpose: to separate the own money
(leisure market) spender from the other people's money (corporate market)
spender. As long as they can maintain this separation, they will gouge the
corporate spender.
We are in a period when all major airlines are doing their
utmost to persuade business travelers to book directly with the airline through
the internet. They are offering double miles, lower prices, and many other
enticements. The purpose of course, is to divert corporate travelers from
genuine travel agents who are specialists at finding lower fares. The less
you know about their complex and ever changing airfares, the more you will
pay. The gap between low and high is so large and there are so many fares
in-between, that the only way to defend yourself against airline gouging is
to learn the rules of the game yourself.
A new seminar offered by a division of ALL TRAVEL of San Francisco,
TRAVEL EDUCATIONAL SEMINARSä, (800) 362-4305, is designed to train travelers
at large corporations. They will send airline ticketing experts to corporate
offices to conduct 2 to 3-hour training seminars, teaching travelers the basics
of airline faring rules and practices, and how to use them to their own advantage.
Travelers must learn the rules of the game before booking
directly through the internet. Otherwise, they are playing a game against
an opponent who wrote the rules and changes them to his own advantage at whim.
Paying three times more than any person spending his own money is like losing.
Remember, all faring rules are airline-created. Large corporate booking agencies
obey them. Leisure agents, who deal with people spending their own money,
do not. That is why the airlines are trying to put them out of business or
at least, to drastically reduce their numbers. The sole purpose of these rules
is to make corporate spenders pay three times more than the personal spender.
Considering that the basic product is transportation, any
premium over the lowest fare paid to fly on a plane, is for terms only. When
a round-trip ticket between New York and San Francisco can be bought for $330,
employees of big corporations will pay between $1,300 and $2,000, but what
are they getting for the additional $970 - $1,670? Terms will vary with each
passenger and trip, but here are the more significant terms being bought by
big American corporations:
1) Departure time convenience.
2) Frequent flier status - resulting in a cornucopia of benefits like upgrades,
preferred seating, bonus miles, free tickets and other benefits.
3) Fare refundability. 4) Freedom from any penalties.
4) Freedom from airline-created limitations to block return days and times.
Is it really worth the money? Sometimes, but mostly it is
not. Certainly nobody spending his own money would pay the equivalent of two
extra tickets, for those terms. We can buy a new laptop for $1,670, or quite
a nice suit or dress or piece of jewelry, which would yield much more pleasure
over a longer period of time. Big business however, with all their expertise
in manufacturing, purchasing, and pricing, seem to have accepted the role
of silent victims when it comes to buying airline tickets.
Small businessmen with more time restrictions than people
on personal trips, will usually pay half, or less, than big business travelers,
for the same trip, if not the same time or plane. They use small, real travel
agencies. The price range for airline tickets on most routes controlled by
a major airline, is between 300% and 500%. Corporate travelers pay in the
higher ranges, and own money fliers pay in the bottom range - even when the
same person does both. But, if a person knows how to travel for less, why
does he spend so much on airline tickets when someone else pays? The answer
is not as simple as you may think.
Even a very frugal person may find himself flying on a $2,000
ticket from Los Angeles to Washington D.C. if his employer or client handed
him the ticket. If he had to buy the ticket himself, he probably would have
done it for $330 - $800, through his personal travel agent, depending on how
restrictive his itinerary was. Small businesspersons usually prefer to find
ways to beat the system. They will try anything to avoid those full fares.
They are the most frequent users of the famous back-to-back (buying two round-trip
tickets when they are cheaper than two one-way tickets) and hidden construction
point (using only part of a ticket) tickets. These are the two loopholes in
the convoluted airline faring system that airlines cannot control.
The airlines have been punishing travel agents for doing these
tickets for clients but airlines do these tickets themselves. In fact, before
deregulation, agents were trained to use these very techniques to help reduce
airfares! Travel agents have started to fight back recently, by suing American
Airlines under RICO laws (Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
Act). American corporations should seriously consider lending them a hand
in this fight, which benefits none other than the business traveler. Actually,
travel agents don't make a penny more for writing a $2,000 domestic ticket,
than one for $700.
However, travel agents are losing the battle with the recent
substitution of a good consumer bill by one actually drafted by the airlines
themselves, thanks to presidential hopeful, Sen. John McCain (R. Arizona),
of Keating Five fame. Airline lobbyists had a chat with him. The original
bill protected people who used back-to-back and hidden city tickets. The new
bill doesn't.
The airlines have focused attention on improved passenger
services and thus have successfully dodged the fare issue, their principal
concern. Perhaps lobbyists for all other American businesses should have lunch
with Sen. McCain and put an end to this gouging by the airlines. Even big
oil cannot raise prices 50% without a Senate investigation. Airlines, amazingly,
can change fares all day long, by 100% or more, with impunity, and in lock
step with one another. They are exempt from antitrust laws and can only be
sued in federal court.
Airlines are more than "deregulated" they are "unregulated".
They understand the value of good lobbying. If a shift to making individual
travelers responsible for buying the lowest possible fares through their personal
travel agents is too traumatic, corporations might consider the 7-DAY NUMBERä
system. Travelers call a certain number whenever they want to book less than
7 days before departure or, are stuck with a fare of over $1,000 or, whatever
other threshold the company may choose.
A company employee (as opposed to an agency employee) at the
other end of this number will either book the traveler or farm it out to a
local, real travel agent, who will ferret out the lowest fare. All tickets
costing more than $1,000 must be issued or authorized by the 7-DAY NUMBERä
department.
Do not allow the big corporate booking agency to issue any
full fare tickets. i.e. No approval needed for cheap, restricted tickets,
but all full fare tickets must be checked for alternatives. It is also important
to add incentives, like the loss of airline preference if booked by this department.
This would encourage the learning of airline ticketing rules and could save
$1,000 or more, per ticket, creating an automatic review system for all high
fare tickets.
The gouging is so outrageous that no matter how many people
are assigned to the task of reducing the cost of airline tickets, the company
will be rewarded with a hefty dividend. This is a fat plum that needs to be
plucked.
##### END #####
Peter Splingaerd is Partner, in charge of corporate bookings,
at All Travel, creator of the 7-DAY NUMBERä system, and founder of TESä (Travel
Educational Seminars). |
|